46-21 is # 24 in the nation latest 5 years, despite averaging # 8 Scout.com Recruit Rankings

http://football.stassen.com/cgi-bin/records/calc-wp.pl?start=2010&end=2014&rpct=&min=&by=Win+Pct

 

# 24 in Won/Lost Record latest 5 years, despite averaging # 8 Scout.com Recruiting Rankings.

 

God Awful.

 

Some folks have TRIED to shut me up on this.  I however am right on this aren’t I ?  How can we be # 24 won/lost record with the average # 8 Scout.com recruiting rankings for the latest 5 years ?

 

Because we are POORLY COACHED.

 

Mark Richt has LOST CONTROL of this football program and doesn’t give a shit.

 

Does he ?

 

Hasn’t he ?

 

 

Well punks ?

 

I have been trying to tell you this that Mark Richt quit coaching after 2007.

 

When do you get it ?

 

 

3-12-2015

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “46-21 is # 24 in the nation latest 5 years, despite averaging # 8 Scout.com Recruit Rankings

  1. 46-21 is a .686 winning %. Not too great but the lifetime program winning % is .648%. Still I agree it needs to be better than 46-21.

    Mark Richt’s winning % is .739%…. Some perspective there

    2010 was the worst season in 30 years. Obviously rock bottom there. Since then we’re 40-14 with a .740 winning %. That would put us in the top 15 maybe top 10 of your list that you reference. I want better for sure but that’s not “God Awful” considering we play in the SEC and your list has teams like Northern Illinois, Boise St and Georgia Southern ahead of us.

    If you look at the last 4 years since we hit rock bottom as a program and you only include teams from Power 5 conferences, our .740 win % would be in the top 10-12.

    Guess what…. we’re a top 10-15 program. Always have been. Always will be. Although I’d like to see better results, we’re right about where we should be historically and trending up. We’ve added Pruitt and he’s got the defense on the come up again, we’ve expanded the quality control staff, we’re finally back at 85 scholarship players after dipping low for the last several years as you like to point out, we’re building a IPF and we have the #1 QB in the nation coming in next year. Things are looking up. Let’s see what happens this year and then look back over the previous 5 years.

    Like

    1. Bullshit asshole 46-21 good for # 24 in the nation won/lost record is somehow good for # 11 all-time football program in wins.

      Get over your dumbass self butt hole.

      You told me yesterday dumb shit that you wanted me to look at the last 5 years, instead of breaking our Mark Richt’s record into two seven year segments, his 1st half and his 2nd half of his entire 14 years here.

      So, I did.

      Now, you have some further distortions about even this.

      Excuse the hell out of me, but did I miss it where you said that 41-26, averaging MORE THAN 4 LOSSES A SEASON FOR YOUR STINKING 5-YEAR PERIOD, is # 24 nationally ?

      I certainly do see where you clicked the damned URL Link to see that the # 11 all-time program in Wins is # 24 for your precious little crappy-ass five year period.

      So, say it ?

      You ALREADY now have admitted that # 24 nationally “is not too great.”

      So, say it ?

      Bring yourself to admit that # 24 nationally is what we are over your choice of the current 5-year period.

      Note, if you will that Mark Richt averages the # 8 Scout.com recruiting class over this period.

      # 8 recruits
      # 2 NFL Draft Picks
      # 24 won/lost

      What’s wrong with this picture you little shit in here bragging on Mark Richt ?

      Todd Gurley II said it best : We’re mediocre and lose too much.

      That’s what Todd Gurley II said.

      See can you bring your lying piece of shit mouth to say that we’re IN FACT # 24 in won/lost record the current 5-year period ?

      I’ll wait for that boy.

      Like

      1. Go back and read my post. I said look back at the last 4 years. I said to take the 1st 5, 2nd 5 and most recent 4 years and seperate them. Thats not what you did. You took the most recent 5 years which includes 2010. Thats not what I said.

        LAST 4 YEARS DUMBASS! NOT LAST 5. You got that?

        I’ll say it one more time… If you look at the last 4 years since we hit rock bottom as a program in 2010 (worst season in 30 yeaes) and you only include teams from Power 5 conferences, our .740 win % would be in the top 10-12 Of your list.

        I’ll wait for you to say that you dumb old fucker.

        Like

      2. “Excuse the hell out of me, but did I miss it where you said that 41-26, averaging MORE THAN 4 LOSSES A SEASON FOR YOUR STINKING 5-YEAR PERIOD, is # 24 nationally ?

        I certainly do see where you clicked the damned URL Link to see that the # 11 all-time program in Wins is # 24 for your precious little crappy-ass five year period.

        So, say it ?

        You ALREADY now have admitted that # 24 nationally “is not too great.”

        So, say it ?”

        This doesn’t even make sense. I’m not sure what you’re asking me. Why don’t you try taking your time to read what I actually posted and then take your time to respond with complete sentences. What do you want me to say? I said that 46-21 is not good. I’m not arguing that. You pointed that out when you quoted me above.

        I SAID LAST 4 YEARS YOU DUMBASS, INCOHERENT, DECREPIT, OLD FUCK.

        Like

      3. I don’t remember “bragging” on Mark Richt either. Where do you get this shit? I’m just pointing out that if you change your sample size to 2011-2014 and take the bullshit, non-power 5 teams off that list of yours then we’re actually in the top 10-12 which is where we should be. How is Georgia Southern and Northern Illinois record relevant in comparison to ours or anybody else in a power 5 conference? As you pointed out, we’re #11 all-time wins. Take those bullshit teams out and that’s exactly where we fall on your list over the LAST 4 YEARS.

        What don’t you understand about that?

        Like

        1. You are still making excuses, as the Mark Richt Apologist you are, for the fact that we have 29 losses the latest 7-year period and 21 losses the latest 5-year period – both OVER 4 LOSSES A SEASON AVERAGE, with our # 8 Scout.com recruiting ranking average.

          This is unacceptable, and you continue to fail to say so.

          You spend your days bragging on Mark Richt when in fact he has been piss poor the entire 2nd half of his career here – after 2007.

          Mark Richt’s recruiting has consistently been among the best in the nation.

          What dropped-off after 2007 is his winning.

          Admit it, and move on for you shall never make it otherwise.

          And, of course, that is what you do not like about me : that I call Mark Richt out about his lack of winning – his losing – after 2007, despite his # 8 average Scout.com recruiting ranking.

          There is NO EXCUSE POSSIBLE for averaging the # 8 Scout.com recruiting ranking and yet over the entire 2nd half of his career here (after 2007) only beating 54 % of the teams who played in a damn bowl game the year he played them after 2007.

          You have been taken to the damn cleaner on this in here because he is not beating the teams making the top 25 that year he played them away from Sanford, can only beat nowadays these latest 7 years 54 % of the bowl teams, loses games because he is a dumb shit coach who makes glaring game management mistakes, and bragged to ALL of us just a few scant weeks ago now that here at Georgia, we adhere to something more important than winning.

          Bullshit we do.

          It’s unacceptable to average more than 4 losses a season for 7 years now with the # 8 Scout.com recruiting ranking. Send that message to Mark Richt and his supporters, instead of wiggling in your chair trying to figure out how to make him look great instead by direct contrast.

          Like

          1. OH MY GOD! Here you go with the 7 years ago shit again. You’re an idiot. Im just stating statistical FACTS. You can’t be reasoned with which is why YOU’VE BEEN BANNED FROM EVERY GEORGIA BLOG EVERYWHERE.

            There hasn’t been a lack of winning since 2007. There was a lack of winning from 2007-2010. Since then we have a .740 win%. I’d LOVE nothing more than to win another SEC championship and ultimately a NC but .740 is not a lack of winning Numbnuts.

            I’m not making excuses for anyone asswipe. I’ve barely mentioned Mark Richt in our discussion. I’m not bragging either. I acknowledged that your seven year statistic is correct. Can you acknowledge that my 4 year statistics are correct? I guess you can’t. You’re too hung up on the past. The fact is the last 4 years since we hit rock bottom as a program in 2010 (worst season in 30 years) if you only include teams from Power 5 conferences, our .740 win % would be in the top 10-12 Of your list. WHICH IS EXACTLY WHERE WE FALL ON THE ALL-TIME WINS LIST.

            That’s not an excuse. Im not wiggling in my chair. That’s a fact based on your statistics.

            True or False? 46-21 is a .686 winning %

            True or False? UGA’s lifetime program winning % is .648%

            True or False? From 2011-2014 (4 most recent years) we’re 40-14 with a .740 winning %

            Can you admit that you negative old dumbfuck?

            Who cares what we did 7 years ago. When you have a job review the boss doesn’t say, “well… you’ve improved greatly over the last 4 years, 2 years ago you were 1 play away from being the best in your class but we’re gonna have to let you go because you fucked up 7 years ago.”

            It just doesn’t happen. The boss would definitely bring up any bone headed quick descision you’ve made that hurt the company and rightfully so but they’re not going back 7 years. They’re looking at the most recent body of work.

            Please answer those True or False questions for. I’d like to see if you are reasonable or completely delusionable. I think I already know that answer though.

            Like

          2. Why do you insist on including 2010? Why 5 years or 7 years?

            Is 4 years not a big enough body of work to formulate a hypothesis?

            2010 was an anomaly. When you’re doing research and trying to determine patterns based on said research, you throw out anomalies because they skew the final results which doesn’t paint a clear picture of the end statistic that you’re after. It’s called the scientific method. Do you know what that is you fucking moron?

            Like

      4. You understand that Richt has coached here for 14 years right?

        That’s 5, 5 and 4. He ascended for 5 years. He descended for the next 5 and hit rock bottom in 2010. The next 4 years after that we’very begun to trend up again. I want to focus on the most recent 4. They are the most relevant.

        After this year it’ll be 5, 5 and 5 for a total of 15. Then we can talk about 2011-2015 results.

        You understand that right? Even a ranting, delusional fuck tard like yourself can grasp that simple concept.

        Like

  2. Here’s my original comment:

    “How do all your dumbass stats look in the 1st 5 years vs. The 2nd 5 years vs. the last 4 years? Could you maybe make a case that he slipped in the middle 5 years but has righted the ship in the most recent 4 years?”

    How did you misunderstand that for the last 5 years? It clearly says last 4 years? You just live in your own little world don’t you?

    It clearly says 1st 5 years, 2nd 5 years and most recent 4 years.

    Like

You can REPLY POST here by filling-in your comment :

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s